Why the Government is wrong about advocating a time-limited approach to phonics teaching (Part II).
In the last posting, I stated that about thirty to thirty-five percent of children of the sample (average age 7 years and three to four months) I was talking about were not yet more than two years above their chronological age. However, only between two and six percent were below their chronological age.Is the two… Continue reading Why the Government is wrong about advocating a time-limited approach to phonics teaching (Part II).